Showing posts with label East Malaysian perspective. Show all posts
Showing posts with label East Malaysian perspective. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

malaysiakini: Self-interest in Kuan Yew's 'anguish' over M'sia... by Joe Fernandez

Self-interest in Kuan Yew's 'anguish' over M'sia
Joe Fernandez
malaysiakini, Sep 15, 2010
3:44pm
 
COMMENT Singapore Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, 87 tomorrow, is predictable on Malaysia - which coincidentally emerged on Sept 16 - in his interview on Sept 1 with the New York Times/International Herald Tribune (NYT/IHT)
Malaysia is the main item in his 'regrets' category as he looks back on his long life.

He's still "teary-eyed" - although his crocodile tears, as referred to by Tunku Abdul Rahman - should have dried up a long time ago as he sees a nation, which he "fought so hard to bring together", unraveling before his very eyes across the causeway.

lee kuan yewThis is a common observation among many non-Malays, if not Malays, in the country and Singapore: "Malaysia is really a beautiful country. God made it that way. But just look at what's happening to it?"

Lee (left) will probably have several more years of "anguish" - if that's the right word - over Malaysia, his faculties still intact, if the Gods that he denies permit him continued good health. 

After that anything goes. It will really be tragic if Lee has to spend his last days like his wife, bed-ridden and unable to speak since a stroke two years back. This must be doing Lee in as well, although he puts up a brave front.

The major difference between Singapore and Malaysia, under the ruling elite, remains the same today as it was in 1965 when the city state was booted out of the new federation after two years.

There's no denying the fact that the ruling elite are squatting on all Malaysians under the guise of standing up for Malay and bumiputera rights. It was Lee himself who thundered just before the expulsion of Singapore from Malaysia: "If they (the Malay elite in Kuala Lumpur) think that they can squat on us and get away with it, they are sadly mistaken."

Fifty-odd years later, squatting is also the main complaint of Hindraf Makkal Sakthi - the ad hoc apolitical movement which initially began as a reaction against the conversion of Everest hero M Moorthy ostensibly to Islam - which marshaled nearly 100,000 people to take to the streets in late 2007 to send shivers down the spine of the ruling elite.

Lee clearly did not describe Malaysia as a failed state, as Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin claims, or even close to it. Khairy's over-reaction is probably a case of "siapa makan cili, dia yang rasa pedasnya" (whoever eats chilli, will feel its burn).

What Lee is saying is that Malaysia has not done well, obviously compared with Singapore, and could have done better. He's also saying that Singapore could have done even better had Malaysia done better, whether the city state is within or outside the country.

Why Malaysia has not done as well as it should have is not exactly the best kept secret in the world.

There's a ruling elite in Malaysia, the same elite that Lee thundered at in 1965, that has managed to hoodwink a large portion of the rural vote bank to back its long stay in power in cahoots with the non-Malay elite. Between them, they have done in the rest of the nation.

The story behind the story

It would be pointless belabouring the various issues which Lee has raised in pointing out the dilemma that Malaysia faces today. He has mentioned the Indians, Chinese, the Chinese language, Tamil, English, Bahasa Malaysia, the education system, and the effort to turn Malaysia into a solely Malay-run country with only Malays occupying all key posts, among others.

johor singapore causeway 041106We need to get behind Lee's rhetoric, true as it is. He was mindful of Singapore's commercial interests in not telling the story behind the story.

For starters, the entire structure of the ruling BN leaves a lot to be desired. The BN concept circumscribes the democratic process by tacitly endorsing elite "power-sharing" and denying the grassroots meaningful participation in elections, and by extension, nation-building. In reality, the non-Malays in BN are elected by Malay votes, having long been discredited by their own communities.

Umno, the ruling party, has a hidden self-serving agenda behind euphemisms like power-sharing, the BN spirit, and consensus-and-compromise.

They have hijacked Article 153 of the federal constitution from the King and indulged in gross deviations and distortions of the New Economic Policy (1970-1990) to serve a handful in the ruling elite and their fat cats in tow.

Behind the BN facade, the ruling elite has been making hay the last 50-odd years while the sun shone, stealing the people's sweat from the public treasury through government projects that they award themselves through nominees.

This has seen government procurements and projects costing the taxpayer twice, three times and even up to ten times what it should actually cost. The fact that the national debt burden has been estimated to be as high as 70 percent of the gross domestic product should therefore come as no surprise.

To camouflage the entire scam, every issue in Malaysia is twisted and turned into a racial issue to scare the Malays into circling the wagons and gathering under one political platform i.e. Umno. So, the party hopes to remain in power in perpetuity under this colonial-style divide-and-rule tactics even if it means that the rest of the country has to go to the dogs.
 
Umno toning down on its racist rhetoric since 2008 has seen the entry of Perkasa, led by Pasir Mas MP Ibrahim Ali and endorsed by former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, to take up the slack.
If Mahathir feels that the Malays still need defending after 53 years of independence, the question that arises is whether he has been tending to their needs during his long innings in power or his own.

Malaysia, Lee would probably agree, needs to get away from the BN and the sooner the better. Of course, Lee himself is exactly in no position to preach here as his People's Action Party (PAP) has also been in power since independence.

The PAP's long stay in power aside, Lee would no doubt point to the fact that unlike BN, it is not race-based and cannot be accused of squatting on the Singaporeans in the manner that Umno has done in Malaysia.

Among the poorest states
Also perhaps preying on Lee's conscience is the fact that Sabah and Sarawak are among the poorest states in Malaysia today, as virtual colonies of Malaya, despite vast land reserves and oil and gas resources.

Sabah only agreed to Malaysia after the late Donald Stephens was persuaded by Lee. Malaya needed Sabah and Sarawak to balance the bigger number of Chinese with the entry of Singapore into the federation. 

True, Lee had no way of knowing that his island was going to be kicked out soon from the federation.

Had Sabah stayed out of the federation, Sarawak would have stayed out too like Brunei at the 11th hour and there would have been no Malaysia. Singapore would have in fact done well by itself, just as it has done since 1965.

There was no need for Lee to push for merger with Malaya but he did. His fear of a communist takeover of the island was much greater than other considerations including the welfare of the people in Sabah and Sarawak. 

But Lee wanted the breathing spell that Malaysia gave him, albeit for two years, to enable him to consolidate the PAP's iron grip on the city state.

JOE FERNANDEZ is Malaysiakini's Sabah pointman who feels compelled to put pen to paper when something doesn't quite jell with his weltanschauung (worldview). He readily admits that there's a demon in him at times, urging him on.

Monday, March 15, 2010

Malaysian Insider: Jema Khan: The battle for hearts and minds

The battle for hearts and minds

by Datuk Jema Khan

Malaysian Insider, MARCH 15 — It is incumbent on any party who wishes to govern to win the hearts and minds of the majority. The problem is that in a many different races, cultures, religions and a geographically diverse population finding what appeals to the masses is tricky.

From my experience in Sabah a decade ago, I would say that what works in Sabah does not apply to Peninsula Malaysia. The people of Sabah at the time were more concerned about wholly domestic and local issues: can we have a gravel road, electricity, water pumps, free housing etc. The national issues such as Anwar’s black eye took a back seat to their day to day needs and wants. Fulfilling these needs basically won Barisan Nasional (BN) the state election in 1999.

The only real battle for hearts and minds in Sabah centred on the Muslim bumiputra community to unite under one banner which was Umno. This was possible because the previous party in power made the Muslim Bumiputras feel marginalised with only one or two members from this community having state cabinet posts.

Today in Sabah I sense that the people as a whole are more concerned with the development of the state. On the whole Sabahans are battle weary from politics as we have changed the state government a number of times in our history. The only proviso I would put to this is the “Allah issue” which I feel must be settled to the satisfaction of our Christian brothers. The reality is Sabah should probably be the poster boy for 1 Malaysia.

In the urbanised Klang valley, the issues are very different: the people are richer, better informed and have stronger ideological views. There is no real question of lack of infrastructure. The main issues here are crime, corruption and public transport. However, even if the Government was able to solve these issues, they would still have a problem with many peoples’ hearts and minds. The opposition too is trying to capture the hearts and minds of the urbanites.

Umno through Perkasa seems to be focusing heavily on Malay rights (though I have to wonder what its demonstration outside the Australian embassy on Anwar’s trial has got to do with Malay rights) at a time when at least two of its major component parties are having serious problems. I wonder how many percent of the Malay voters’ hearts and mind it will capture with this strategy and whether it may actually lose more Malay liberals and moderates than it gains?

PAS and PKR are also actively trying to capture the Malay middle ground in the urban and semi-urban areas. PAS is painting itself as a more accommodating party to the other races although its ideological base is conservative Islam. PKR is a multiracial party bridging the divide between PAS and DAP. Yet its ideological base is unclear and perhaps purposely so. PKR can thus accommodate those who are not ideologically in tune with the more established parties.

I have a strong feeling that many people want a two party system to flourish in Malaysia. Many will not want to show their preference too early. As a result, I believe we will all be wooed by both sides in the next few years. The question is how will they woo us? Will they say that their ideology is better than the other party or will they accept and incorporate liberal thinking into their ideology?

In promoting Agenda Liberal Melayu on Facebook, my hope is that whoever wins, we will be able to have a more liberal Malaysia which will implement in total the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights which Malaysia is actually already a party to. As a former politician I would however like to caution everyone that politicians, in general, will do whatever it takes to win.

If they can’t get your heart and mind, your vote will do very nicely thank you.

Datuk Jema Khan is a former Sabah Umno Youth leader. He is now businessman pushing the Agenda Liberal Melayu in Facebook.
* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the columnist.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Why is your Allah not my Allah?

Why is your Allah not my Allah?
Erna Mahyuni
Jan 6, 10
10:22am

comment As an East Malaysian, I am neither surprised nor angry about Malay/Muslims being up in arms over the 'Allah' High Court ruling.

It was to be expected, really.

What does anger me is getting comments from West Malaysian Christians that it is 'silly' for Christians to lobby to use the word 'Allah'.

One rather un-enlightened Christian said that "Allah is also a word used to describe one particular god in a pagan religion...so for Christians to use 'Allah' is strange and silly."

The whole 'Allah' debacle highlights a bigger, more endemic problem in the Malaysian, or should I say West Malaysian mentality: General ignorance of how the 'others' or 'lain-lain' live.

It seems very hard for most West Malaysians to understand that:
  • Not all bumiputeras are Malay.
  • Not all bumiputeras are Muslim.
It isn't just West Malaysian Muslims who have a very limited worldview but Christians as well.

They don't understand that in East Malaysia, with its high population of indigenous Christians, Bahasa Malaysia is used in services.

Most of these Sabahan and Sarawakian Christians have spent their whole lives thinking, praying and referring to their God as Allah Bapa (Father God).

Allah wordAnd now the government says they can't. That only Muslims can use the word 'Allah' when that isn't true in other countries.

Look at Indonesia, the country with the largest Muslim population in the world, which allows the printing and dissemination of bibles in Bahasa Indonesia that refer to God not as 'Tuhan' but as 'Allah'.

The Indonesian Muslims don't worry that their brethren will be 'confused' by these bibles. So why is our Home Ministry and all these religious groups up in arms?

The answer to that is politics. Religion is, unfortunately, something as mixed up with politics as is race. Political parties unabashedly use religion as a tool to win debates, with Umno often accused of trying to 'out-Islam' PAS.

Religion is not a private matter in this country and is, instead, aired like so much dirty laundry. What other Southeast Asian country has officially sanctioned civilian peeping Toms who consider it their civic duty to weed out fornication?

Malay is our language, too

Despite the many varied ethnicities in Sabah, they have managed to get along without bloodshed or May 13-like incidents.

How have we managed it when West Malaysia's three main races mostly give each other a wide berth? It's called tolerance, people.

All Sabahans speak a slightly modified version of Malay with the funny little suffix 'bah' tagged behind a lot of words or sentences.

In rural areas, this heavily-accented version of Malay is the only means for most people to communicate with each other. They speak, think, dream and yes, even pray in the language.

Sabahan Michelle Quek asks: "Is it more important to recognise that some Muslims lay claim to the word as being exclusive to their faith, or recognise that a practical need for the word exists for East Malaysian Christians?"

christian faith 030108 crossHer question embodies the difficult balancing act that Malaysia has in attempting to address the needs of its varied peoples as well as the gulf between East and West Malaysia.

Kavin Ch'ng, who is married to a Sabahan says that locally, for many generations, Malay-speaking Christians have always referred to Allah and Tuhan in the same breath.

"Why only now does the government kick up such a fuss?" he asks. What is important, Ch'ng says, is mutual respect.

"I think there is a way to co-exist - if only our government can actually wrap its head around the concept of context."

Sarawakian El'Bornean finds it disturbing that West Malaysians now want to dictate how one's personal faith is practiced.

"The true Malaysians are here in Sabah and Sarawak," he says, citing examples of his Muslim friends who have no qualms sitting with friends in non-halal stores and visiting churches.

Despite being surrounded by Christians, East Malaysian Muslims do not consider their faith easily shaken, he asserts.

Sabahan Dusun Zara Kahan has a humorous, if facetious, solution.

"If (some) Muslims insist on ownership of the term 'Allah' then Christians must do the same with the term 'Tuhan'. Do you know how many Hari Raya songs will be in jeopardy? End of issue!"

No, we don't want to convert you

In West Malaysia, technically Christian worship services in Malay are illegal. But Sabahan and Sarawakian students ask for them anyway.

Many of these Malay-speaking East Malaysians feel uncomfortable attending worship services in English because the terms are unfamiliar. Muslims often cite the 99 names of Allah and for Christians in East Malaysia as well as Lebanon and Syria, Allah is their name for God.

All this talk about 'confusion' is really the product of West Malaysians not mixing with their East Malaysian brethren.

If you visit the Dusuns in Ranau, you could well meet locals as fair as highland Chinese with slanted eyes who would greet you with the traditional Muslim salam.

Wander into an East Malaysian Chinese coffee shop and you would see tanned, Malay-looking locals happily digging into char siew or other pork dishes

In East Malaysia, you can't easily tell what faith someone professes or what race his forefathers were just by looking.

This is very disturbing to the West Malaysian psyche. I have met West Malaysians who get very agitated when I refuse to tell them either what religion I profess or what race I am.

They don't know what to do with me because they can't categorise me. I don't fit into their safe little boxes which decide how they will treat me.

What annoys me as well is this West Malaysian paranoia that Christians have a secret ongoing campaign to convert Muslims on the sly.

council of churches malaysia forum 250407 audienceLet us be honest. If converting Muslims to Christianity was as easy as pouring holy water into your drinking water or putting the word 'Allah' in all available religious literature, the Pope would have sanctioned it years ago.

Christians don't get 'brownie points' by forcibly converting unwilling Muslims.

I suppose all the Malay-looking Christian East Malaysians really confuse the locals to the point they rabidly proclaim that churches are succeeding in their nefarious campaign to take over Muslim souls.

In East Malaysia, Christians and Muslims come in various sizes, shapes and colours. Even huge extended families often have different religions, sometimes staying under one roof.

It is not unusual for an East Malaysian to have not just Christian, but Buddhist, Muslim and animist relatives. A friend of mine says it is a convenient excuse to celebrate the many public holidays with more gusto.

When told that someone is marrying a person of another race, the common reaction is: "Oh, your kids will be cute!" No heated discussion about traditions or religious differences because the unspoken assumption is that the couple will work them out.

Because they do.

Be Malaysia, not 1Malaysia

A well-known comedian talked about the recent Al-Islam undercover foray into churches. Its so-called investigative journalists entered churches on false premises and desecrated the communion wafer.

Did the Christians protest? asked the comedian. Did they declare bloody war? Did they have angry sermons and plan noisy demonstrations outside churches on Sunday?

No. What did the Christians say? "Forgive them-lor. Pray for them-lor."

The comedian mused that the incident was actually excellent public relations for the church.

Despite our annoyance with West Malaysian intolerance, do you see East Malaysians picketing?

We gripe, we grumble, we send politely worded statements. Yet we still believe in the Malaysia that our Tourism Ministry tries to sell, but which seems to be a myth in West Malaysia.

Do you want to know why? Deep in the heart of most East Malaysians, we truly believe in tolerance. We believe in the ideals of Malaysia.

We don't have to give 'muhibbah' a name because we live it. Since 1963, we have lived as Malaysians, believing in true tolerance and that race or religion matters little.

We truly do believe that West Malaysians can and should get over us using 'Allah' to worship God. Isn't Allah the God of all mankind? Isn't your Malaysia our Malaysia too?


Erna Mahyuni, a Sabahan, is a Malaysiakini team member.